[Talk] Getting people involved in FLUX/volunteering in general
Samuel Greenfeld
talk@flux.org
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:48:06 -0500
I'm sorry if I've been going off on a tangent from the main group, and I
kind of knew the channel's status in relation to the group, but its hard
to say what kind of friendship I had with him anyway. While I knew the
person in question reasonably well for someone I only knew online, I do
not have any proof to back up any of the claims I have heard from him
over the years (as someone mentioned, special ops; also a board member
of a few firms, British knighthood, etc.).
But I do know that he has been involved in several arguments which
eventually led to project forks, one of which he now leads with I'm not
certain how much (if any) of the few people that originally followed him
(some of which have since returned to the previous project).
Personally, I just wish they all got along.
That being said; I may pursue this a bit, largely out of principal, but
I'm not going to just be the only one idling in a channel that used to
have 5-6 people at least present in spirit at any given time. If we do
get it back or move elsewhere, we likely should petition for at least
some marginal channel support from the group; I think one of the
mistakes that we made that other LUGs did not is to formally let the
Freenode network people know of a few channel contacts.
I think some of the problem is that a lot of people do not realize how
much goes into IRC politics; I fail to do so often as well. Perhaps it
is a lesson learned on how the daemon system (nickserv/chanserv/etc.)
was supposed to keep everyone from playing games like this; but people
on IRC a lot like me still need to be kept on their toes.
---
SJG
Adam Glass wrote:
> Perhaps I should have pointed this out before, but the #flux channel
> was never exactly part of the FLUX user group. As I recall, two or
> three people came up with the idea but nobody else expressed interest.
> They went ahead and created the channel anyway but FLUX never ran it,
> oversaw disputes within (or about) it, or anything like that.
>
> The same is true for this latest episode of taking the channel back.
> If a few people want to spend their time and effort over it, more
> power to them. But based on what I've seen, the official group
> getting involved would not have made a difference anyway. It looks
> like the deciding factor was that nobody from FLUX used the channel
> during the time in question.
>
> It's understandable that some want social engineers punished and so
> this was an issue worth fighting for in to some folks, just on
> principle. But as others have stated, there are already established
> places on IRC for Linux help. If a few folks in our group want an IRC
> channel to chat in, great. But does its name really matter enough to
> spark arguments over and ruin friendships over?
>
> --Adam
>
>
>
> On 12/15/06, Terry Richards <sn00per1@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>>
>> > All right... new topic here, kind of related to the old one, but a bit
>> > of a rant. Maybe I will hate myself later this morning for writing
>> > this; maybe not.
>> > ...
>> > So to make me feel better, in addition to any discussions we may or
>> > may not have about actually figuring out if we want to go the option
>> > to get it back that I was originally offered last week prior to
>> > Terry's attempt (I'm not certain how many people actually read
>> > talk@flux.org; perhaps that is the problem), let's discuss a bit how
>> > we can prevent a similar situation in the future. I would also be
>> > interested in suggestions how to get people involved with clubs and
>> > volunteering in general; with two-income families and taking the kids
>> > out everywhere, there seems to be less time to understand and do other
>> > things than ever before.
>> >
>>
>> in palm beach, i joined the young republicans back in 2000 or so. same
>> thing there as far as participating. only 150 members and only half a
>> dozen of them actually doing anything month to month...i have done many
>> things like volunteer at the library to put books back on the shelf
>> where they belong, pick up litter, feed the hungry, that is my nature. i
>> fix things around my neighbors' homes and resist any attempt to pay me
>> for my efforts although i do take table scraps :-) ^2. i am a community
>> oriented person since i was a child. i had it made in the shade and
>> figured the only thing left for me to do was help other people.
>>
>> since #flux was not even listed on the flux.org website i only happened
>> upon it by chance, it would be just as easy to start a new one and then
>> maybe even publish the location so that folks who are troubleshooting a
>> certain problem doesn't clog up the mail lists. maybe state a problem on
>> the list then go to irc to chat back and forth and publish the results
>> back on the list. i took the liberty to start #flux-talk if anyone with
>> a bellybutton wants to discuss it in real time i am idling there.
>>
>> /|\
>> ps. rueben led me to believe he was yeilding the channel back and then
>> changed his tack on the spur of the monent claiming his reason was that
>> no one from flux was using it < a lie as several were there > so he
>> kicked me and changed #flux to invite-only. he did not say, i'll give
>> it back if flux uses it, he said he was gonna move his operation to
>> #fluxradiostaff and flux wasn't his but "ours" until dkr made these
>> statements:
>> <dkr> aloha
>> <dkr> I stopped autojoining this chan last year when the crowd of us
>> that started it years ago died out. :)
>> <dkr> howdy grumpydog. I haven't seen you in ##politics in a long
>> while. :)
>> <dkr> looks like biz took down his web server with the channel stats
>> page, too: http://www.jbisbee.com/linux/irc/
>>
>> from my point of view ... that is what put the nail in the coffin not
>> me, i also have the logs where rueben says he agrees to vacate but lost
>> the password so the staff at freenode will have to get involved...
>>
>>
>> ChanServ gives channel operator status to sysipus_99
>> <sysipus_99> thnx
>> * sysipus_99 has changed the topic to: Florida Linux Users eXchange
>> flux radio staff is at #fluxradiostaff
>> <sysipus_99> does the topic look good?
>> <grumpydog> no leave #fluxradiostaff out of it
>> <grumpydog> I will speak to the revelant people
>> <sysipus_99> ok i just thought it might be good to redirect anybelly
>> looking for fluxradio for a while
>> <grumpydog> not really
>> * sysipus_99 has changed the topic to: Florida Linux Users eXchange
>> <grumpydog> better
>> <sysipus_99> ok it was just a thought
>> <grumpydog> Ok I am out now for a while I need some serious sleep
>> <sysipus_99> 12:30 huh?
>> <grumpydog> yes
>> <grumpydog> good luck :)
>> ...
>> <grumpydog> Cerlyn, I am off to bed anyway. It did make sense the you
>> have the channel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk mailing list
>> Talk@flux.org
>> http://www.flux.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> Talk@flux.org
> http://www.flux.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
>