[Linux] Backup software

[Michael Marschall]

That would work, but it does not even require that. You could have per
workstation shares or the aforementioned single server share that is setup with
rights from a local (Windows side account) smb mounts can be authenticated.
Things like smbtar and smbclient can also use auth; be it local, or
centralized; Windows AD or some other LDAP or evne NIS with SFU. Lots and lots
of options here. Keep and open mind and do whatever is best for you. My only
strong suggestion is to manage as much of your env from a UNIX based OS as
automation will be 10X easier and future changes will also be 10X easier. 

Mike

 
--- Javier Lombillo <javier@asymptotic.org> wrote:

> > > Requiring users to place their data on world-readable shares isn't an
> option.
> >
> > I never said anything about world-readable shares. I think you are mixing
> > emails or simply making the wrong assumption.
> 
> The latter . . . I assumed you meant XP's simple file sharing.  So
> what did you mean, having all the users join an AD domain and then
> getting Samba to do LDAP?
> 
> j
> _______________________________________________
> Linux mailing list
> Linux@flux.org
> http://www.flux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love 
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265