[Cert] Poll

Lawrence Kagan cert@flux.org
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:22:41 -0500


--=-0dXKbJgJ9+6qZCQInMvy
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kwan,

You're the only one that replied to the poll.  I sent in my reply
earlier with the pdf objectives of the Linux+ and the LPI attached and
that didn't get through.  It's funny, my requested times were biweekly
at 10:30 on Saturdays for 2 hours.  However, I chose the Linux+.  But to
be honest, I can go either way.  Unfortunately, I don't see this going
any further.  It doesn't seem there's enough motivation.  Unless of
course my email wasn't the only one that didn't get through.

To be clear, I will not be following through with the group
certification unless there is regained group interest in the future.

Larry


On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:02 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:

> 1) Take a poll
>     - Include in an email to the certification list,
>         - Which certification you want.
>         - What city you live in.
>         - Ideal time, length of time and frequency of meetings.
> 
> LPI - This is motivated only by the cost of the certification as I think the RedHat
> cert is more practical.  Maybe the RHCE can be the next goal.
> 
> Pembroke Pines
> 
> Bi-weekly meetings, 2 hours in length, 10:00AM (preferably at a coffee shop)
> 
> 2) Take a poll on which text we want to use.
> 
> Running Linux (Matt Welsh) with supplemental material from IBM DevWorks
> 
> 

--=-0dXKbJgJ9+6qZCQInMvy
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.8.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Kwan,<BR>
<BR>
You're the only one that replied to the poll.&nbsp; I sent in my reply earlier with the pdf objectives of the Linux+ and the LPI attached and that didn't get through.&nbsp; It's funny, my requested times were biweekly at 10:30 on Saturdays for 2 hours.&nbsp; However, I chose the Linux+.&nbsp; But to be honest, I can go either way.&nbsp; Unfortunately, I don't see this going any further.&nbsp; It doesn't seem there's enough motivation.&nbsp; Unless of course my email wasn't the only one that didn't get through.<BR>
<BR>
To be clear, I will not be following through with the group certification unless there is regained group interest in the future.<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:02 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">1) Take a poll</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">    - Include in an email to the certification list,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">        - Which certification you want.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">        - What city you live in.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">        - Ideal time, length of time and frequency of meetings.</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">LPI - This is motivated only by the cost of the certification as I think the RedHat</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">cert is more practical.  Maybe the RHCE can be the next goal.</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Pembroke Pines</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Bi-weekly meetings, 2 hours in length, 10:00AM (preferably at a coffee shop)</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">2) Take a poll on which text we want to use.</FONT>

<FONT COLOR="#000000">Running Linux (Matt Welsh) with supplemental material from IBM DevWorks</FONT>


</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-0dXKbJgJ9+6qZCQInMvy--